|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
nettie
Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Posts: 5888 Location: Suffolk
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
Bernie66
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 13967 Location: Eastoft
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 05 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
The problem with humans in settlements is that they produce more sewage than can be handled locally. So we pipe it all off to sewage plants.
Then, we settle it, treat it in activated sludge tanks, aerate it and do the same again. The principle is that bacteria eat the crappy bits (and in fact, ARE the crappy bits), they're eaten by flagellates and cilliates, and rotifers eat the whole bally lot of them. At each trophic level (every step on the food web) you lose some mass, it's released as carbon dioxide or another waste gas. You recycle some of the sludge from part treated matter to inoculate the right microbes in new batches.
So you've got less horrid sludgy stuff at the end. Sounds simple, but it's one of the most complex microbial processes known to man, and as a set of technologies it was developed more than a century ago and has hardly been improved upon since.
The liquid is released when it's clean enough; it has to go somewhere, so it is tested for things like phosphate, nitrate, particulates etc. Then it can go to further treatment for reclaiming or be released into waterways.
The sludge, well, by this point it's been so thoroughly modified that the number of potential pathogens left in it is very low. It smells... Bad. But it doesn't smell like human fecal matter any more. It can be safely spread over fields, and this is indeed done, but increasingly many people are (in my view irrationally) opposed to this. It has to go somewhere, it doesn't just vanish |
|
|
|
|
judith
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 Posts: 22789 Location: Montgomeryshire
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 05 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
I bought a couple of bags of cheapo non-peat compost this year (I really must stop doing that), without really giving any thought to its actual composition.
When I sow seeds outdoors, I normally make a trench, water it, sow the seeds and then cover with compost rather than soil, so I can see where I have sown. Shortly into the growing season, I started noticing lots of tomato seedlings coming up all over the place. It took a while, but it gradually sank in where the seeds had come from
I don't know whether to be cross at the very poorly sterilised compost that I bought or amazed at the resilience of the tomato seeds!
Anyway, I let four plants grow just to see what happened, and one is just starting to set fruit. I wonder if it will taste any different |
|
|
|
|
Jb
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 7761 Location: 91� N
|
|
|
|
|
Bernie66
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 13967 Location: Eastoft
|
|
|
|
|
Bugs
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 10744
|
|
|
|
|
Bugs
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 10744
|
|
|
|
|
judith
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 Posts: 22789 Location: Montgomeryshire
|
|
|
|
|
nettie
Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Posts: 5888 Location: Suffolk
|
|
|
|
|
Behemoth
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 19023 Location: Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
monkey1973
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 683 Location: Bonnie scotland
|
|
|
|
|
|