|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Bodger
Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 13524
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Behemoth
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 19023 Location: Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
Jonnyboy
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 23956 Location: under some rain.
|
|
|
|
|
Pilsbury
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 5645 Location: East london/Essex
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 08 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
dougal wrote: |
My sloppy terminology while rushing! Edited above.
However you are actually reinforcing my point.
Surface mould and internal bacteria are VERY different.
Hence transferring the "bloom" from a cured sausage to one starting drying is not an ideal way of transferring the *acidifying* culture !!
But that is what HFW advises in his book - according to Jonnyboy.
This does NOT seem to be HFW's "specialist subject".
|
Oh, that does work though. Very often, but it isn't a foolproof methiod by any means.
Remember, you will have strains of Lactobacillus present anyway. The reason for spiking with more is to ensure that the right fungi grow on the surface of the sausages. Another way of encouraging thatis to ensure that there are plenty of spores present. It'll work very often, but in my opinion to cure sausages without either inoculum or instead saltpetre is a needless increase in risk.
Quote: |
Butcher-Packer state that their surface mould culture reduces the sausage acidity. |
Yeah, but with respect, thats written for butchers, who have a vast range of specialist knowledge that I have a huge amount of respect for, but they aren't microbiologists. The statement isn't incorrect, its just rather a simplification.
Quote: |
I'm trying to clarify to Bodger, and seemingly HFW as well, that this is *different* to the acid-increasing action of the culture for internal protection against future botulism poisoning.
And simplification would have helped clarification! |
Yes, I guess so. |
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 08 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
cab wrote: |
dougal wrote: |
Surface mould and internal bacteria are VERY different.
Hence transferring the "bloom" from a cured sausage to one starting drying is not an ideal way of transferring the *acidifying* culture !!
|
Oh, that does work though. Very often, but it isn't a foolproof methiod by any means.
Remember, you will have strains of Lactobacillus present anyway ... but in my opinion to cure sausages without either inoculum or instead saltpetre is a needless increase in risk. |
IMHO, if *relying* on acidification by culture (no nitrate/nitrite), then the responsible thing to do is to do your very best to make sure that the culture is effective.
In turn that means helping to spread it throughout the inside of the sausage.
AND giving the culture both a deliberate warm 'incubation' treatment, and specific food (such as a little of a sugar - dextrose is often advised, presumably to minimise sweetening). Although Cab's posted recipe seems to omit these latter stages, I trust he'll agree that (regardless of his own techniques) they are part of the orthodox method.
I think it would be wrong to suggest that a quick wipe to transfer traces of surface mould is, by itself, an adequate method of countering the risk of the most serious form of food poisoning, botulism.
It bears repeating that this potentially fatal poisoning is *not* detectable by smell, taste or appearance. You wouldn't know from looking or eating that there was anything wrong.
"Silent but deadly."
This is the crucial reason why it is important to remove the possibility of the problem, rather than to "try it and see".
You can't tell until you've actually been poisoned.
cab wrote: |
dougal wrote: |
Butcher-Packer state that their surface mould culture reduces the sausage acidity. |
The statement isn't incorrect, its just rather a simplification.
Quote: |
And simplification would have helped clarification! |
Yes, I guess so. |
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 08 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
Here is a document about C. Botulinum (covering food, wmd and Botox) by
Professor Mike Peck, Head of the Food Safety and Computational Microbiology Group, Scientific Programme Leader in the Food Safety Science Division, Institute of Food Research, Norwich, (who surely ought to be regarded as authoritative) that should be of great interest to anyone following this thread
https://www.sfam.org.uk/pdf/features/gbugly.pdf
The emphasis is mine.
Professor Peck wrote: |
... rapid treatment ... has led to a reduction
in the fatality rate (now approximately 10% of cases).
This proportion is still high for a foodborne illness.
...
The name “botulism” was given to a disease reported in
central Europe in the nineteenth century that was
frequently associated with consumption of blood
sausage; the word ‘botulism’ being derived from the Latin
botulus meaning sausage.
At the end of the nineteenth century, Emile van Ermengem
first isolated a causative organism (initially called
Bacillus botulinus) from home made raw salted ham
and the spleen of a man who later died of botulism. This
outbreak, in Belgium, affected 23 musicians (three fatally).
...
Through the understanding and implementation of
effective control measures, the incidence of botulism is today
generally much lower than in the early part of the twentieth
century. Foodborne botulism involving commercial
processing is uncommon, but the consequences can be
severe. Most cases are now associated with home-
prepared foods, when known control measures have not
been implemented. For example, in Poland from
1984-1987, there were 1301 outbreaks reported giving
1791 cases, of which 46 were fatal.
...
Many other countries have lower, but significant rates of
foodborne botulism. For example, over the past 20
years, approximately 35 cases have been reported annually in
Italy, with many associated with home-prepared
vegetables in oil.
Approximately 25 cases have been reported annually in
France and Germany, and frequently involved home/farm
prepared hams. ...
Approximately 10 cases have been reported annually in
Spain, and involved home canned vegetables. These
foods are not generally prepared at home in the UK,
consequently the incidence of foodborne botulism is lower. |
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 08 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
dougal wrote: |
IMHO, if *relying* on acidification by culture (no nitrate/nitrite), then the responsible thing to do is to do your very best to make sure that the culture is effective.
|
I agree. I remember s talking about this to the Sardinian lady who used to lodge with us, I asked her whether for home use farmers out in Italy still rely on mold getting on to the sausages without acifification. She thought I must be mental, and hilighted the importance of adding a good culture and how everyone she knows (she's a Sardinian farm girl) who makes their own sausages adds a culture.
Quote: |
In turn that means helping to spread it throughout the inside of the sausage.
AND giving the culture both a deliberate warm 'incubation' treatment, and specific food (such as a little of a sugar - dextrose is often advised, presumably to minimise sweetening). Although Cab's posted recipe seems to omit these latter stages, I trust he'll agree that (regardless of his own techniques) they are part of the orthodox method. |
A sugar source is often part of the orthodox commercial approach but I'm wary of that for home use, you run the risk of almost ensilaging the meat if you're not careful.
Quote: |
I think it would be wrong to suggest that a quick wipe to transfer traces of surface mould is, by itself, an adequate method of countering the risk of the most serious form of food poisoning, botulism.
It bears repeating that this potentially fatal poisoning is *not* detectable by smell, taste or appearance. You wouldn't know from looking or eating that there was anything wrong.
"Silent but deadly."
This is the crucial reason why it is important to remove the possibility of the problem, rather than to "try it and see".
You can't tell until you've actually been poisoned.
|
All true. Yet the risk is still not that great. But, frankly, when curing sausages I choose to remove that risk as best I can by adding bacteria. |
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 08 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
cab wrote: |
...
All true. Yet the risk is still not that great. But, frankly, when curing sausages I choose to remove that risk as best I can by adding bacteria. |
We are agreed that it isn't a big chance, however, the consequences can be so serious that it is well worth taking the simple steps (curing salts and/or culture) to effectively eliminate that risk.
Its very hard to say what the chance might be if one doesn't take precautions -- not least because as Cab says people that now know how to protect themselves DO use culture and/or curing salts.
To get an idea of the chance, I think you'd have to look at historical info -- before people really knew how to prevent it.
And, as the Prof says in the PDF linked above, it used to be *frequent*.
Hence, I'd probably estimate it as a significant chance with raw cured sausage. Its not just a matter of a theoretical possibility.
But whatever the odds from going unprotected, its simple to do it safely.
As with other stuff... |
|
|
|
|
ros
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 2469 Location: Beds
|
|
|
|
|
kevin.vinke
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 1304 Location: Niedersachsen, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 08 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
kevin.vinke wrote: |
A question though reference frozen meats. Firstly using frozen to make cured sausages. Secondly can a previously frozen sausage then be hot smoked and refrozen? |
The danger with using frozen meat isn't the freezing process, its more the problem with how long it takes to freeze and defrost, thats all extra time for things to go off. If I had to, and knew I'd be pushed for time, I'd go with cutting the meat up first, freezing on trays, then bagging it up to make into sausages later; spread the meat out to defrost more quickly, that should minimise risk.
And of course cooked food can be refrozen; so, again, if its a hot smoker then you're just cooking it, its like taking a bit of meat out of the freezer, cooking it, and freezing the leftovers. Shouldn't be any problem with that. |
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|