Wind farm 'maps' generate new row

Latest Articles

Wind farm 'maps' generate new row
Page 1, 2 Next

Downsizer Forum Index -> Energy Efficiency and Construction/Major Projects

Author

Message

Behemoth

Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 19023
Location: Leeds

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 10:14 am Post subject: Wind farm 'maps' generate new row
https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4484236.stm

Lozzie

Joined: 25 May 2005
Posts: 2595

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 2:47 pm Post subject:

I have a question though: The Scottish RSPB lady says ""We'll be looking at the death of up to 50 golden eagles, 50 merlin, about 250 red throated divers, hundreds of dunlin, hundreds of golden plover too."

How do they figure that out? How do they know that these birds will DIE as a result of teh wind farm? do they mean - when the construction work is bing carried out?

She also says: "We welcome renewables, but not at the expense of the environment. "

Perhaps she is one of those people that think nuclear power might be more beneficial to local wildlife?

Confused

dougal

Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 7184
Location: South Kent

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 3:12 pm Post subject:

ISTR reading somewhere that the average gi-normous wind turbine kills one or two birds per year - even where there are a lot of birds around.
The towers and blades are pretty visible...
... whereas power transmission lines are relatively invisible (EDIT: I just mean the *wires* are nearly invisible), and quite a lot of birds fly into them - big birds especially, like swans. Many cables get "flagged" with marker balls on the wire - makes them even uglier, but safer for birds. Not something that gets a lot of publicity.

I must admit I'm rather intrigued as to how anyone can come up with a figure of 234 turbines, rather than 233 or 235... (Maybe its based on how many you can buy for your round number of millions? Or are there 234 "sweet spots" within economical cable length on the island?)
And then there's the optimisation of the locations for each of them - I'd guess it mainly has to do with the shape of the terrain... but *optimising* the layout seems like one heck of a challenge...

Last edited by dougal on Thu Dec 01, 05 3:56 pm; edited 1 time in total

Gervase

Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 8655

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 3:53 pm Post subject:

I'm puzzled by many of the claims made by those who object to wind farms (and given that one of the most prominent is Noel Edmonds...well, enough said!).
Have they ever seen one of the turbine towers up close? They claim that the noise is a problem, yet all I can hear even on a blustery day is a steady and gentle 'swoosh' from the blades.
And as for the carnage among the birds - if that were the case one would expect to see feathers and carrion littering the ground under the turbines, and I've never seen any. I imagine that domestic cats have a far greater effect on the bird population than the UK's wind turbines (at least ours do!).
Like many issues where lines are drawn in the sand, people on both sides seem to rehash the same old arguments, regardless of whether or not they're based on fact.
For myself, I rather like our local wind farm - there's something rather wonderful and elegant about the turbines - and they're certainly a darned sight easier on the eye than pylons.

gil
Downsizer Moderator

Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 18423

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 4:00 pm Post subject:

I think part of the visual objection can be that in rural areas there are few manmade features cluttering up the skyline (even allowing for the increase in mobile phone masts), and you can see further afield. A wind farm tehrefore makes a massive visual impact on a wide area.

We have one windfarm starting to build early next year, with plans for the other one (on the other side of the valley) on hold, hopefully indefinitely, because of the issue of low-flying aircraft (proposed site is on MOD flightpath). One is OK. Two would be toooo much.

dougal

Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 7184
Location: South Kent

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 6:20 pm Post subject:

I 'm with Gervase that the aesthetics of big wind turbines aren't offensive to me. While powerline pylons in beautiful countryside are.
And for me personally, I'd far rather have wind turbines than the RAF practising low flying...

The BBC don't mention that the RSPB figures for 50 dead eagles are an estimate for the 234 turbines over 25 years that the windfarm is expected to operate for.
When the RSPB man said "We'll be looking at the death of up to 50 golden eagles, 50 merlin, about 250 red throated divers, hundreds of dunlin, hundreds of golden plover too" he is even misunderstanding his own organisation's position. The RSPB believe that hundreds of dunlin and golden plovers will be *displaced* (not killed) by the development.
The figures are based on the developers 'environmental impact statement' which I believe has to give 'worst case scenarios'.
https://www.rspb.org.uk/scotland/action/lewis/impacts.asp

sean
Downsizer Moderator

Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 42228
Location: North Devon

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 6:41 pm Post subject:
As far as I can gather the RSPB and its supporters and members are totally divorced from reality. When I worked for Oddbins we used to get hate-mail/ people coming into the shops telling us that we were going to be responsible for the extinction of a whole range of species on the Iberian peninsula. This was based on some of our wines having screwtops/synthetic closures.

wishus

Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 777
Location: Northampton, East Midlands

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 7:13 pm Post subject:
I think wind farm turbines can look quite pleasant... perhaps not as pleasant as the bare, unadulterated skyline, but I think many of the voices you hear raised in protest about these things are often NIMBYists.My boyfriend says he is going on an anti-protest protest about objection to wind farms near where he lives in Northampton.

Cathryn

Joined: 16 Jul 2005
Posts: 19862
Location: Ceredigion

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 9:27 pm Post subject:

I do have a problem with windfarms. If you go up off the main road between Llangurig and Llanidloes - all you can see for miles is windmills - every hill top. And if you go the back way between Rhayader and Devils Bridge - go soon because this huge wide moorland is going soon. It is NIMBYism - I only ever go on these roads half a dozen times a year at the most but it is beautiful land and I am going to miss it. Our local one which I go riding in regularly is very noisy - there is no way I would live anywhere near it. But then I had a problem with the supersize fan that they use in the Institute of Grassland research to pollinate plants artificially. We lived about half a mile away and the low level noise used to drive me mad. The rest of my family barely heard it. On the other hand my daughter can hear high pitched noises which I cannot hear at all.

I cannot come up with any alternatives though and there's my problem. Is it the M56 just past Chester going North where there is amazing industry that glitters brightly every night - why can't windmills go up there? (The place with all the cooling towers) I love driving that way when it's dark - the windmills would look good there during the day.

Bernie66

Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 13967
Location: Eastoft

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 9:34 pm Post subject:
could be my local motorway the M53. It might look glittery at night but as soon as I get out of my car when driving back from Wales the air quality changes back to nasty as you pass that industry.At least winfarms there would be providing something useful as opposed to just an aweful air quality. moan moan moan.

judith

Joined: 16 Dec 2004
Posts: 22790
Location: Montgomeryshire

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 9:36 pm Post subject:

If I look out of my bedroom window I can see the windfarm they are in the process of building. So far they have erected 13 of the intended 17 turbines. I am very much in favour of wind power, but even so it is a shock to have these huge structures suddenly appear - literally overnight - in my beloved view.
I don't think it is nimbyism to feel that way. I love watching turbines and I would far rather have them than a power station across the valley, but they are so huge and so out of place in this beautiful landscape that it is difficult to come to terms with the sight.

sean
Downsizer Moderator

Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 42228
Location: North Devon

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 9:42 pm Post subject:
I think that's fair enough. What people like the RSPB seem to fail to consider is that the power has to come from somewhere, barring some huge societal shift which just isn't going to happen. Still, it could be worse, they could be building a coal fired jobbie in your field of view.

Bernie66

Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 13967
Location: Eastoft

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 9:44 pm Post subject:

sean wrote:

I think that's fair enough. What people like the RSPB seem to fail to consider is that the power has to come from somewhere, barring some huge societal shift which just isn't going to happen.
Still, it could be worse, they could be building a coal fired jobbie in your field of view.

Or a new "Tony approved" nuclear one; think i will go for the wind turbines.

gil
Downsizer Moderator

Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 18423

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 10:16 pm Post subject:

and we get the best of both worlds here

On the hills the windfarm, and Chapelcross nuclear power station towards the Solway Firth. OK, it's being decommissioned now...

Rumoured plans to build a replacement on the same site may or may not have been scuppered by the thought that when global warming gets worse, the Solway plain will be even more prone to flooding.

I'm wholly in favour of wind, solar and water power. I think turbines look OK, and the sound doesn't bother me. Just not more than one clump of them visible from one place. Anyone here already experienced the disruption caused on narrow winding roads by construction traffic ? We've got that joy to come.

ele

Joined: 05 Sep 2005
Posts: 814
Location: Derby

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 05 11:15 pm Post subject:

sean wrote:

I think that's fair enough. What people like the RSPB seem to fail to consider is that the power has to come from somewhere, barring some huge societal shift which just isn't going to happen.

What's confusing me is that the RSPB have their own green energy package which includes wind energy sources, so I'm guessing that they are pro windpower but not in environmentally (bird) sensitive areas.

https://www.rspbenergy.co.uk/Home/Products/RSPB/WhatIsGreenEnergy.aspx

	Downsizer Forum Index -> Energy Efficiency and Construction/Major Projects	All times are GMT Page 1, 2 Next
Page 1 of 2

View Latest Posts