Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Long range EVs
Page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 93, 94, 95
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Energy Efficiency and Construction/Major Projects
Author 
 Message
dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 43839
Location: yes
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 25 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

is the 1kv kit public proof?

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 16257

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 25 8:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

If lithium can be reclaimed from waste or from things like spoil heaps of china clay, then the price should drop and the extraction be more ethical and cleaner. Sodium is more easily obtained than lithium, so long term it might have advantages.

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 43839
Location: yes
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 25 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

making Na metal is a bit moody, no worse than smelting steel and a lot safer than playing with "hot cell stuff"

thermal Pu to steam to personal vehicle has less merit that a nitrocellulose fireguard

any of the above are loads safer than burning oil as a default energy source

even as a metal Na is sort of ok, at least it is predictable

sodium azide, ummmm
i did tell them what it was and what it could do, some folk do not read labels or documentation and then they whine about me destroying their plant

approx 500 gm of sodium/sodium azide is the most disturbing thing i found in a chemical store
very elderly diethyl ether is ok unless it breathes, accidental lead picrate is safe if moistened etc etc
i have played nitrations small and unknown and very personal, then big after that, town is still where it was

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 16257

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 25 7:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

When I worked in the chemistry lab we had a lot of Winchesters of sodium cyanide in the bottom of the chemical cupboard courtesy of a previous Chief Chemist who had an idea about making up his own cyanide plating bath. While I was there a new Chief Chemist was appointed and he had them removed by a specialist company. The one in between made a small amount of an explosive, who's name I can't 50 years on, remember. I have a feeling it was a sodium iodide of some sort, and it was evaporated on filter paper which was then broken up and scattered on the floor so anyone walking on it had tiny explosions under their feet. He threatened me with instant dismissal if I tried the same thing.

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 43839
Location: yes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 25 12:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

ammonium.........

fairly harmless

vehicle airbags are very rapidly filled with a tiny amount of semi stable azide (no idea what types they use) as propellant with an electric starter

azides are not for me , ever, a silver bracelet and an ice car is a recipe i know and i will never use bimetal salts is a harmless euphemism for death wish

that sodium azide is the scariest substance i have handled, there have been a few

if i was in that situation again i would phone Catterick UXO and ask if they were busy today

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 43839
Location: yes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 25 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

unstable and keen on entropy vs toxic

as a cupboard find i much prefer toxic

Slim



Joined: 05 Mar 2006
Posts: 6671
Location: New England (In the US of A)
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 25 2:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Descriptions of hydrofluoric acid always made me a bit anxious

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 43839
Location: yes
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 25 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

F if it is contained it might be safe, loose is no longer contained

U and 6F is spin city

F as a salt is ace for dental care

i have never played with it, Cl and Br are "interesting" in elemental form

Cl I and Cl Br are very interesting, odd crystal forms, and daft corrosive/unpleasant as "simple chems" might be rated

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 16257

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 25 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Hydrofluoric acid is nasty. I have used fluoboric acid and that was the only time I was actually instructed to wear gloves. We used to do tin/lead plating and the bath was fluoboric acid based. The gold was cyanide based. I also had an electroless copper tank that was black and thick in appearance with copper coloured bubbles. Most people wouldn't go near it as it looked as if something nasty was about to emerge. By most standards even the larger plating baths we were using were quite small, and the plating line I set up was even smaller, so not on what you might call an industrial scale where they can be the size of swimming pools.

jema
Downsizer Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 28264
Location: escaped from Swindon
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 25 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Battery claims
The following link is to the complete list of claims I have been compiling.

https://martindavidwalker.blogspot.com/2024/09/battery-claims.html

The new claims in the last week are as follows.
March 28th 2025, Hina launches Sodium EV batteries
The batteries boast 165wh/kg which is virtually on a par with many LFP batteries and can cope with 8000 fast charges and low temperatures. So on a 200 mile range battery that would be 1.6 million miles.
On the subject of sodium I'm starting to see adverts for home sodium batteries. The home is where cycle life becomes important. If my car battery only lasts 1000 cycles it probably wouldn't bother me. But a home battery could cycle twice a day in intense use. 1000 cycles then becomes 18 months. LFP can be as low as 3000 which is still under 5 years. 8000 takes us to over 10 years intense use.

https://cnevpost.com/2025/03/28/hina-sodium-ion-battery-solution-commercial-cars/
March 21st 2025, CATLs second generation Sodium battery
The claim is that it approaches LFP performance metrics with significant cost advantages. Notably it has been a set back for Sodium that the price of Lithium has come down drastically from its peak, but notably even then Lithium was just 25% of the cost of producing a battery pack. So with Lithium down 80% from it's peak in 2022 one has to ask if the significant cost advantage comes in production as well as materials? But as batteries become commodities “significant” can mean just a few percent!
https://autonews.gasgoo.com/new_energy/70036285.html

jema
Downsizer Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 28264
Location: escaped from Swindon
PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 25 2:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Did the trip to see Amipest, a journey that strikes me as a pain in a typical EV, but because the M3 has a closure we took a longer route back via M40, M4 and A34 unlike the M3 route where services are a pain, this route has I think 5 motorway services.
So it does come down to how much does it matter if it's not a trip being done that often?


Battery claims
The following link is to the complete list of claims I have been compiling.

https://martindavidwalker.blogspot.com/2024/09/battery-claims.html

The new claims in the last week are as follows.
April 1st 2025, Californian start-up Inlyte partners with Swiss manufacturer Horien on Sodium Iron Batteries.
Claims of very long life batteries with costs as low as $35 kwh. That translates to 0.3 cents a kwh when used as grid storage using readily available materials.
It really makes a mockery of Nuclear and non battery storage solutions.
https://newatlas.com/energy/sodium-iron-battery-storage-inlyte/

Nicky cigreen



Joined: 25 Jun 2007
Posts: 9930
Location: Devon, uk
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 25 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

jema wrote:
Did the trip to see Amipest, a journey that strikes me as a pain in a typical EV, but because the M3 has a closure we took a longer route back via M40, M4 and A34 unlike the M3 route where services are a pain, this route has I think 5 motorway services.
So it does come down to how much does it matter if it's not a trip being done that often?



I think you are right, it probably doesn't matter if it isn't something that you need to deal with very often. Out of curiosity, how far were you travelling, how often did you have to stop to recharge? and how long did each stop have to take for a recharge?

near me a site that once was a little chef has become one of the largest charging stations in the county, and the shop is a farm shop with cafe - it's become a popular stopping point.

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 43839
Location: yes
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 25 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

muskie is scared of and challenged by them being better than him at making stuff(the money is irrelevant by now)

BYD etc are his emotional problem far more than an economic one

trump is arserelevant, old man doing beard for the players

just a name on a brand

jema
Downsizer Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 28264
Location: escaped from Swindon
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 25 6:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Nicky cigreen wrote:
jema wrote:
Did the trip to see Amipest, a journey that strikes me as a pain in a typical EV, but because the M3 has a closure we took a longer route back via M40, M4 and A34 unlike the M3 route where services are a pain, this route has I think 5 motorway services.
So it does come down to how much does it matter if it's not a trip being done that often?



I think you are right, it probably doesn't matter if it isn't something that you need to deal with very often. Out of curiosity, how far were you travelling, how often did you have to stop to recharge? and how long did each stop have to take for a recharge?

near me a site that once was a little chef has become one of the largest charging stations in the county, and the shop is a farm shop with cafe - it's become a popular stopping point.


I don't actually have an EV, but pretend I do on long journeys. Mostly the hypothetical EV wins on time because it would start full.
this trip is designed to be awful for EVs. But still is only more inconvenient in that I would have to take the pain of stopping on the journey day.

Nicky cigreen



Joined: 25 Jun 2007
Posts: 9930
Location: Devon, uk
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 25 9:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

jema wrote:
Nicky cigreen wrote:
jema wrote:
Did the trip to see Amipest, a journey that strikes me as a pain in a typical EV, but because the M3 has a closure we took a longer route back via M40, M4 and A34 unlike the M3 route where services are a pain, this route has I think 5 motorway services.
So it does come down to how much does it matter if it's not a trip being done that often?



I think you are right, it probably doesn't matter if it isn't something that you need to deal with very often. Out of curiosity, how far were you travelling, how often did you have to stop to recharge? and how long did each stop have to take for a recharge?

near me a site that once was a little chef has become one of the largest charging stations in the county, and the shop is a farm shop with cafe - it's become a popular stopping point.


I don't actually have an EV, but pretend I do on long journeys. Mostly the hypothetical EV wins on time because it would start full.
this trip is designed to be awful for EVs. But still is only more inconvenient in that I would have to take the pain of stopping on the journey day.



oh, I thought you had a nissan leaf - I wonder who i was thinking of then.

A useful exercise then.

I think an enforced stop isn't a terrible thing, we just need to adjust to accepting it.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Energy Efficiency and Construction/Major Projects All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 93, 94, 95
Page 95 of 95
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright 2004 marsjupiter.com